Athlon 64 3300+: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3300+
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.24

Athlon 64 3300+ provides poor benchmark performance at 0.24% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

AMD started Athlon 64 3300+ sales on April 2004. This is a NewCastle architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 1 core and 1 thread, and is based on 130 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 2400 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket 754 processor with a TDP of 89 Watt.

Primary details

Athlon 64 3300+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking3182
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.25of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenameNewCastle (2004)
Release dateApril 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)
Threads1
Boost clock speed2.4 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
L1 cache128 KBof 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache256 KB
L3 cache0 KBof 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography130 nmof 3 nm (Core Ultra 9 285K)
Die size144 mm2
Number of transistors105 millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3300+ compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H)
Socket754
Power consumption (TDP)89 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Athlon 64 3300+. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 3300+ 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3300+ 375

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

Athlon 64 3300+'s performance relative to its closest rivals among desktop CPUs.


E1-1500 104.17
E1-1200 100
Athlon 64 3300+ 100
Celeron 440 95.83

Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Athlon 64 3300+ is Celeron 440, which is slower by 4% and lower by 5 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon 64 3300+:

Pentium D 915 120.83
Celeron 450 112.5
Celeron G440 108.33
Athlon 64 3300+ 100
Celeron 827E 95.83
Celeron 440 95.83

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Athlon 64 3300+, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Athlon 64 3300+ in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 6 configurations using Athlon 64 3300+ in our database.

GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
16.7% (1/6)
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
16.7% (1/6)
ATI HD 5770 Radeon HD 5770
16.7% (1/6)
GeForce 210 GeForce 210
16.7% (1/6)
ATI X1600 Radeon X1600
16.7% (1/6)

All comparisons with Athlon 64 3300+

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3300+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.