Celeron M 630 MHz vs Athlon 64 3200+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 3200+ and Celeron M 630 MHz processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3245 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.20 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clawhammer (2001−2005) | no data |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $150 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 3200+ and Celeron M 630 MHz basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.63 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 154 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 3200+ and Celeron M 630 MHz compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 5 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 5 Watt |
Celeron M 630 MHz has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1680% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3200+ and Celeron M 630 MHz. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 3200+ is a desktop processor while Celeron M 630 MHz is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3200+ and Celeron M 630 MHz, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
