i3-14100F vs Athlon 64 3100+

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated786
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.66
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data15.69
Architecture codenameLima (2008−2009)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache128K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size77 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistors122 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3100+ 484
i3-14100F 15278
+3057%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 58 Watt

Athlon 64 3100+ has 132% lower power consumption.

i3-14100F, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3100+ and Core i3-14100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3100+
Athlon 64 3100+
Intel Core i3-14100F
Core i3-14100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 168 votes

Rate Core i3-14100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3100+ or Core i3-14100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.