3020e vs Athlon 64 3100+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 3100+
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.30
3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
+410%

3020e outperforms Athlon 64 3100+ by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3100+ and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31102137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency1.1324.12
Architecture codenameLima (2008−2009)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release dateApril 2008 (16 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3100+ and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache128K192 KB
L2 cache512K1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistors122 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3100+ and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2FT5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3100+ and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3100+ and 3020e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3100+ and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 3100+ 0.30
3020e 1.53
+410%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3100+ 484
3020e 2433
+403%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 1.53
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

3020e has a 410% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3100+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 3100+ is a desktop processor while 3020e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3100+ and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3100+
Athlon 64 3100+
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3100+ or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.