Celeron 7305 vs Athlon 64 3000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Alder Lake-U (2022)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads15
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB464 KB
L2 cache512K3.5 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB
Chip lithography130 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz
Execution Unitsno data48

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 3000+ 334
Celeron 7305 2451
+634%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 5
Threads 1 5
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 7305 has 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and 493.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 3000+ is a desktop processor while Celeron 7305 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 3000+ and Celeron 7305, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 3000+
Athlon 64 3000+
Intel Celeron 7305
Celeron 7305

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 110 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 119 votes

Rate Celeron 7305 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 3000+ or Celeron 7305, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.