Xeon E-2436 vs Athlon 64 2600+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 2600+
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.15
Xeon E-2436
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.16
+9340%

Xeon E-2436 outperforms Athlon 64 2600+ by a whopping 9340% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3310517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.50
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.9520.60
Architecture codenameLima (2008−2009)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$331

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size77 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors122 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 2600+ 0.15
Xeon E-2436 14.16
+9340%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 2600+ 243
Xeon E-2436 22487
+9154%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 14.16
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 64 2600+ has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2436, on the other hand, has a 9340% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Xeon E-2436 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 2600+ in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 64 2600+ is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2436 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 2600+ and Xeon E-2436, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 2600+
Athlon 64 2600+
Intel Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E-2436 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 2600+ or Xeon E-2436, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.