Phenom X4 9150e vs Athlon 5150

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 5150
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.91
Phenom X4 9150e
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
0.92
+1.1%

Phenom X4 9150e outperforms Athlon 5150 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25432532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.321.29
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Agena (2007−2008)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache256 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2285 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data450 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM1AM2+
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 Graphicsno data
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 5150 0.91
Phenom X4 9150e 0.92
+1.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 5150 1388
Phenom X4 9150e 1414
+1.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 5150 173
Phenom X4 9150e 234
+35.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 5150 476
Phenom X4 9150e 817
+71.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.92
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon 5150 has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

Phenom X4 9150e, on the other hand, has a 1.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 5150 and Phenom X4 9150e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 5150
Athlon 5150
AMD Phenom X4 9150e
Phenom X4 9150e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 46 votes

Rate Athlon 5150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 24 votes

Rate Phenom X4 9150e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 5150 or Phenom X4 9150e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.