Athlon 240GE vs Athlon 300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 300U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.48
Athlon 240GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.90
+16.9%

Athlon 240GE outperforms Athlon 300U by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17561665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.42
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD Athlon
Power efficiency15.367.70
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge 2 (2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)6 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier2435
L1 cache192 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 300U 2.48
Athlon 240GE 2.90
+16.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 300U 3867
Athlon 240GE 4527
+17.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.48 2.90
Recency 6 January 2019 6 September 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 300U has an age advantage of 4 months, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 240GE, on the other hand, has a 16.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon 240GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 300U in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 300U is a notebook processor while Athlon 240GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and Athlon 240GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U
AMD Athlon 240GE
Athlon 240GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 459 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 60 votes

Rate Athlon 240GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 300U or Athlon 240GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.