A4-9120C vs Athlon 300U
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 300U outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 300U and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1771 | 2857 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon | AMD Bristol Ridge |
| Power efficiency | 15.33 | 8.52 |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge 2 (2019) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 300U and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Multiplier | 24 | 16 |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 124.5 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 1200 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 300U and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 300U and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | Virtualization, |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 300U and A4-9120C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 300U and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 14.936 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) | AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 300U and A4-9120C.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.43 | 0.54 |
| Integrated graphics card | 2.98 | 1.17 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Athlon 300U has a 350% higher aggregate performance score, 154.7% faster integrated GPU, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
A4-9120C, on the other hand, has 150% lower power consumption.
The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 300U and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
