Xeon w9-3495X vs Athlon 3000G

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.93
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
60.07
+1950%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Athlon 3000G by a whopping 1950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking166820
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.2718.56
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.6315.65
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date7 November 2019 (5 years ago)15 February 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3495X has 252% better value for money than Athlon 3000G.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads4112
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache192 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?4x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB?4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 3000G 2.93
Xeon w9-3495X 60.07
+1950%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 3000G 4482
Xeon w9-3495X 91936
+1951%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 3000G 958
Xeon w9-3495X 2111
+120%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 3000G 1963
Xeon w9-3495X 18577
+846%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.93 60.07
Recency 7 November 2019 15 February 2023
Physical cores 2 56
Threads 4 112
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

Athlon 3000G has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3495X, on the other hand, has a 1950.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 2700% more physical cores and 2700% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2077 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.