EPYC 9475F vs Athlon 3000G

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1670not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.64no data
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date7 November 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$7,592

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache192 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm2?8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB?no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 November 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt

Athlon 3000G has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9475F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 3000G is a desktop processor while EPYC 9475F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 3000G and EPYC 9475F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G
AMD EPYC 9475F
EPYC 9475F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2091 vote

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9475F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 3000G or EPYC 9475F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.