Xeon E5-4667 v4 vs Athlon 200GE

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 200GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.59
Xeon E5-4667 v4
2016
18 cores / 36 threads, 135 Watt
12.79
+394%

Xeon E5-4667 v4 outperforms Athlon 200GE by a whopping 394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1723595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.271.20
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD AthlonIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency7.008.97
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$55$5,729

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 200GE has 256% better value for money than Xeon E5-4667 v4.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads436
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier3222
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)4.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)45 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2456.12 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data87 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million7200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
PAEno data46 Bit
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1240

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 200GE 2.59
Xeon E5-4667 v4 12.79
+394%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 200GE 4115
Xeon E5-4667 v4 20319
+394%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.59 12.79
Recency 1 June 2018 20 June 2016
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 4 36
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 135 Watt

Athlon 200GE has an age advantage of 1 year, and 285.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-4667 v4, on the other hand, has a 393.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 800% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

The Xeon E5-4667 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 200GE in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-4667 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and Xeon E5-4667 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 200GE
Athlon 200GE
Intel Xeon E5-4667 v4
Xeon E5-4667 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 765 votes

Rate Athlon 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 59 votes

Rate Xeon E5-4667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 200GE or Xeon E5-4667 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.