EPYC 7763 vs Athlon 200GE

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 200GE
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.69
EPYC 7763
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
55.25
+1954%

EPYC 7763 outperforms Athlon 200GE by a whopping 1954% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking171824
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.273.13
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD AthlonAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.0117.99
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date6 September 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$55$7,890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 200GE has 36% better value for money than EPYC 7763.

Detailed specifications

Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier3224.5
L1 cache192 KB4 MB
L2 cache1 MB32 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size209.78 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 200GE 2.69
EPYC 7763 55.25
+1954%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 200GE 4114
EPYC 7763 84557
+1955%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 200GE 916
EPYC 7763 1344
+46.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 200GE 1902
EPYC 7763 10361
+445%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.69 55.25
Recency 6 September 2018 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 280 Watt

Athlon 200GE has 700% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7763, on the other hand, has a 1953.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 3100% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7763 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 200GE in performance tests.

Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while EPYC 7763 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and EPYC 7763, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 200GE
Athlon 200GE
AMD EPYC 7763
EPYC 7763

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 762 votes

Rate Athlon 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1197 votes

Rate EPYC 7763 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 200GE or EPYC 7763, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.