i3-9000 vs Athlon 200GE
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1721 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD Athlon | Intel Core i3 |
Power efficiency | 7.00 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
Release date | 1 June 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | 32 | 37 |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | AM4 | 1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 2.98 | 3.09 |
Recency | 1 June 2018 | 1 September 2018 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Athlon 200GE has 85.7% lower power consumption.
i3-9000, on the other hand, has 3.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and Core i3-9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.