A4-9120e SoC vs Athlon 200GE
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1723 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Athlon | no data |
Power efficiency | 7.00 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) |
Release date | 1 June 2018 (6 years ago) | 7 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Multiplier | 32 | no data |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 125 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | AM4 | FT4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | Radeon R3 2CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2018 | 7 January 2019 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 6 Watt |
Athlon 200GE has 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
A4-9120e SoC, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 483.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while A4-9120e SoC is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 200GE and A4-9120e SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.