Athlon 950 vs Athlon 1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 1400 and Athlon 950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameThunderbird C (2000−2001)Thunderbird (1999−2000)
Release dateJune 2001 (23 years ago)6 March 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Detailed specifications

Athlon 1400 and Athlon 950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz0.95 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography180 nm180 nm
Die size120 mm2102 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors37 million22 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 1400 and Athlon 950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAA
Power consumption (TDP)72 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 1400 and Athlon 950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 72 Watt 62 Watt

Athlon 950 has 16.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 1400 and Athlon 950. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 1400 and Athlon 950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 1400
Athlon 1400
AMD Athlon 950
Athlon 950

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Athlon 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 10 votes

Rate Athlon 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 1400 or Athlon 950, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.