EPYC 7F32 vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 40 Watt
27.17
+86.5%
EPYC 7F32
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
14.57

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms EPYC 7F32 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking180492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.70
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesApple M4AMD EPYC
Power efficiency63.957.62
Architecture codenameno dataZen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)14 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,100

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1416
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.9 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP3
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 20-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.17 14.57
Recency 30 October 2024 14 April 2020
Physical cores 14 8
Threads 14 16
Chip lithography 3 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 180 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 86.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 75% more physical cores, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7F32, on the other hand, has 14.3% more threads.

The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7F32 in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while EPYC 7F32 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and EPYC 7F32, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
AMD EPYC 7F32
EPYC 7F32

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7F32 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) or EPYC 7F32, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.