Xeon 6732P vs Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Xeon 6732P outperforms M4 Pro (12 cores) by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 372 | 75 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 13.01 |
| Designer | Apple | Intel |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (1 year ago) | 1 April 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6732P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.592 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.51 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 144 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 68 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6732P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6732P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6732P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6732P are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6732P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5(6400MT/s) |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 16-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (12 cores) and Xeon 6732P.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 88 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 18.64 | 42.46 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 1 April 2025 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 32 |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 350 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) has 8650% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6732P, on the other hand, has a 127.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.
The Intel Xeon 6732P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M4 Pro (12 cores) is a notebook processor while Xeon 6732P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
