EPYC 9224 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04
+4.9%
EPYC 9224
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 200 Watt
26.72

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms EPYC 9224 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking165183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.65
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4AMD EPYC
Power efficiency29.3312.58
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,825

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data25
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data4x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data26,280 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.04 26.72
Recency 30 October 2024 10 November 2022
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 16 48
Chip lithography 3 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 200 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 4.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9224, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while EPYC 9224 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 9224, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD EPYC 9224
EPYC 9224

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9224 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or EPYC 9224, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.