EPYC 7551 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04
+71.6%
EPYC 7551
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
16.34

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms EPYC 7551 by an impressive 72% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking165407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.28
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M4AMD EPYC
Power efficiency29.338.55
Architecture codenameno dataNaples (2017−2018)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataTR4
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data170.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.04 16.34
Recency 30 October 2024 29 June 2017
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 180 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 71.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7551, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7551 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while EPYC 7551 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and EPYC 7551, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD EPYC 7551
EPYC 7551

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 10 votes

Rate EPYC 7551 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or EPYC 7551, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.