A9-9410 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
28.04
+2821%
A9-9410
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms A9-9410 by a whopping 2821% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1652500
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M4AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency29.336.03
Architecture codenameno dataStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.5 GHz
L2 cacheno data2048 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography3 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data125 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP4
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2133
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 40-core GPUAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.04 0.96
Recency 30 October 2024 31 May 2016
Physical cores 16 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 2820.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

A9-9410, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9410 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD A9-9410
A9-9410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 115 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.