Xeon X5690 vs Apple M4 (10 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 (10 cores) outperforms Xeon X5690 by a whopping 398% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 239 | 1340 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.92 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Apple Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 52.24 | 3.22 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 7 May 2024 (less than a year ago) | 14 February 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $205 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 10 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.46 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.73 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12288 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 239 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 79 °C |
| Number of transistors | 28 Million | 1,170 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| PAE | no data | 40 Bit |
Security technologies
M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 288 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 32 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M4 10-core GPU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 22.08 | 4.43 |
| Recency | 7 May 2024 | 14 February 2011 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 6 |
| Threads | 10 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 130 Watt |
Apple M4 (10 cores) has a 398.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 66.7% more physical cores, a 966.7% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.
Xeon X5690, on the other hand, has 20% more threads.
The M4 (10 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5690 in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 (10 cores) is a desktop processor while Xeon X5690 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 (10 cores) and Xeon X5690, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
