EPYC 9015 vs Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9015 outperforms M3 Pro 11-Core by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 568 | 464 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 26.25 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Apple M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 22.19 | 5.43 |
| Designer | Apple | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | no data | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 30 October 2023 (2 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $527 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
M3 Pro 11-Core and EPYC 9015 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 11 (Undeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 11 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.748 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.06 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 37000 Million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M3 Pro 11-Core and EPYC 9015 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | no data | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and EPYC 9015. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and EPYC 9015 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and EPYC 9015. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Pro 11-Core and EPYC 9015.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.08 | 15.95 |
| Recency | 30 October 2023 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 11 | 8 |
| Threads | 11 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 27 Watt | 125 Watt |
Apple M3 Pro 11-Core has 37.5% more physical cores, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 363% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9015, on the other hand, has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 45.5% more threads.
The AMD EPYC 9015 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Pro 11-Core in performance tests.
Be aware that Apple M3 Pro 11-Core is a notebook processor while EPYC 9015 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
