Xeon E-2176G vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.87
+202%
Xeon E-2176G
2018
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
8.56

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Xeon E-2176G by a whopping 202% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking193891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.52
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M3Intel Xeon (Desktop)
Power efficiency31.3910.13
Architecture codenameno dataCoffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)12 July 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$367

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.748 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data154 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors92000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUIntel UHD Graphics P630
Max video memoryno data128 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.87
+202%
Xeon E-2176G 8.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41090
+202%
Xeon E-2176G 13603

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 3264
+147%
Xeon E-2176G 1324

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 271
+35.5%
Xeon E-2176G 200

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 22938
+266%
Xeon E-2176G 6271

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 2325
+89.8%
Xeon E-2176G 1225

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.87 8.56
Recency 30 October 2023 12 July 2018
Physical cores 16 6
Threads 16 12
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 80 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 202.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 2.6% lower power consumption.

The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2176G in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2176G is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Xeon E-2176G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Xeon E-2176G
Xeon E-2176G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 277 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 17 votes

Rate Xeon E-2176G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Max 16-Core or Xeon E-2176G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.