Atom Z3735G vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
25.86
+5178%
Atom Z3735G
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.49

Apple M3 Max 16-Core outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 5178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1942906
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency31.3623.17
Architecture codenameno dataBay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$17

Detailed specifications

M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.748 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography3 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data112 mm2
Number of transistors92000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataUTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data1 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data5.3 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPUIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data646 MHz

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 25.86
+5178%
Atom Z3735G 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core 41076
+5221%
Atom Z3735G 772

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.86 0.49
Recency 30 October 2023 9 April 2014
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 2 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has a 5177.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 633.3% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has 3800% lower power consumption.

The M3 Max 16-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 276 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Max 16-Core or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.