A100 vs Apple M3 Max 16-Core

VS

Primary details

Comparing M3 Max 16-Core and A100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking194not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M3no data
Power efficiency31.36no data
Architecture codenameno dataStealey (2007)
Release date30 October 2023 (1 year ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M3 Max 16-Core and A100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads161
Base clock speed2.748 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.06 GHz0.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography3 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Number of transistors92000 Million176 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M3 Max 16-Core and A100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 437
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt3 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3 Max 16-Core and A100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M3 Max 40-Core GPUno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 1
Threads 16 1
Chip lithography 3 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 3 Watt

Apple M3 Max 16-Core has 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

A100, on the other hand, has 2500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between M3 Max 16-Core and A100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M3 Max 16-Core and A100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core
Intel A100
A100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 276 votes

Rate M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate A100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M3 Max 16-Core or A100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.