Xeon W3580 vs Apple M2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.76
+314%

Apple M2 outperforms Xeon W3580 by a whopping 314% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 and Xeon W3580 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8021804
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.83
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency44.501.66
Architecture codenameno dataBloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)9 August 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$215

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 and Xeon W3580 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache2 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache20 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data263 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Number of transistors20000 Million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 and Xeon W3580 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 and Xeon W3580. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Apple M2 and Xeon W3580 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 and Xeon W3580 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 and Xeon W3580. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data24 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 and Xeon W3580.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.76
+314%
Xeon W3580 2.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
+314%
Xeon W3580 3609

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.76 2.36
Recency 10 June 2022 9 August 2009
Physical cores 8 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 130 Watt

Apple M2 has a 313.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.

The Apple M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3580 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Xeon W3580 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Xeon W3580, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Intel Xeon W3580
Xeon W3580

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 584 votes

Rate Apple M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 6 votes

Rate Xeon W3580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 or Xeon W3580, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.