Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Apple M2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.40
+121%
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.25

Apple M2 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G by a whopping 121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8141380
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency44.486.19
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)10 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.424 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache2 MB384 KB
L2 cache20 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Number of transistors20000 Million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataSocket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)AMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.40
+121%
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
+121%
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6745

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.40 4.25
Recency 10 June 2022 10 May 2018
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 65 Watt

Apple M2 has a 121.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 225% lower power consumption.

The M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 620 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 88 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M2 or Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.