Celeron M 353 vs Apple M2
Primary details
Comparing Apple M2 and Celeron M 353 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 779 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | no data | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (2 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Apple M2 and Celeron M 353 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M2 and Celeron M 353 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 5 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 5 Watt |
Apple M2 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 353, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and Celeron M 353. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Celeron M 353, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
