Atom C3758 vs Apple M2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2
2022
8 cores / 8 threads, 20 Watt
9.32
+224%
Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.88

Apple M2 outperforms Atom C3758 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M2 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8271685
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.39
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-SeriesIntel Atom
Power efficiency44.4110.98
Architecture codenameno dataGoldmont (2016−2017)
Release date10 June 2022 (2 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

M2 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.424 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache2 MB448 KB
L2 cache20 MB16 MB
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
Number of transistors20000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-

Security technologies

M2 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4: 2400
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 and Atom C3758.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data16
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 9.32
+224%
Atom C3758 2.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 14933
+224%
Atom C3758 4614

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.32 2.88
Recency 10 June 2022 15 August 2017
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 25 Watt

Apple M2 has a 223.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3758 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Atom C3758 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 637 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M2 or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.