3015Ce vs Apple M2
Aggregate performance score
Apple M2 outperforms 3015Ce by a whopping 611% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M2 and 3015Ce processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 852 | 2324 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple Apple M-Series | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Power efficiency | 44.33 | 20.79 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Pollock (Zen) (2020) |
| Release date | 10 June 2022 (2 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M2 and 3015Ce basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.48 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 20 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20000 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 and 3015Ce compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and 3015Ce. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 and 3015Ce. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Apple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz) |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.31 | 1.31 |
| Recency | 10 June 2022 | 4 August 2020 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 6 Watt |
Apple M2 has a 610.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
3015Ce, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.
The M2 is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015Ce in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
