Ryzen 7 8840HS vs Apple M2 Max

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
17.40
+9%

Apple M2 Max outperforms Ryzen 7 8840HS by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking384444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency20.0852.01
Architecture codenameno dataHawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date17 January 2023 (1 year ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed2.424 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache3.3 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache36 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors67000 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP8
Power consumption (TDP)79 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPUAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M2 Max 17.40
+9%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 15.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M2 Max 26633
+9%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 24445

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M2 Max 2084
+1.9%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2045

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M2 Max 236
Ryzen 7 8840HS 268
+13.6%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M2 Max 15373
+55.3%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 9897

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Apple M2 Max 1967
+1.3%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 1942

WebXPRT 3

Apple M2 Max 405
+31.3%
Ryzen 7 8840HS 308

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.40 15.97
Recency 17 January 2023 6 December 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 79 Watt 28 Watt

Apple M2 Max has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores.

Ryzen 7 8840HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, 33.3% more threads, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 182.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 Max and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2 Max
M2 Max
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 232 votes

Rate Apple M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 148 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M2 Max or Ryzen 7 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.