Ultra 5 225H vs Apple M2 Max

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M2 Max
2023
12 cores / 12 threads, 79 Watt
16.67
+4%
Core Ultra 5 225H
2025
14 cores / 14 threads, 115 Watt
16.03

Apple M2 Max outperforms Core Ultra 5 225H by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking411435
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency20.1013.28
DesignerAppleIntel
Release date17 January 2023 (2 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data4
Efficient-coresno data8
Low Power Efficient-coresno data2
Threads1214
Base clock speed2.424 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache3.3 MBno data
L2 cache36 MBno data
L3 cache48 MB18 MB
Chip lithography5 nmno data
Number of transistors67000 Millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)79 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT, DirectML, WebNN

Security technologies

M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-6400
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 Max 38-Core GPUIntel® Arc™ 130T GPU
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H.

PCI Express lanesno data28
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Apple M2 Max 16.67
+4%
Ultra 5 225H 16.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Apple M2 Max 26745
+4%
Ultra 5 225H 25717

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.67 16.03
Recency 17 January 2023 1 January 2025
Physical cores 12 14
Threads 12 14
Power consumption (TDP) 79 Watt 115 Watt

Apple M2 Max has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, and 45.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 225H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Apple M2 Max and Intel Core Ultra 5 225H.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2 Max
M2 Max
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
Core Ultra 5 225H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 239 votes

Rate M2 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 225H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M2 Max and Core Ultra 5 225H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.