Apple M2 Pro vs Apple M2 Max
Aggregate performance score
Apple M2 Max outperforms Apple M2 Pro by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M2 Max and M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 393 | 544 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M-Series | Apple Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 20.14 | no data |
| Release date | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 17 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
M2 Max and M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.424 GHz | 2.424 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 3.3 MB | 3.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 36 MB | 36 MB |
| L3 cache | 48 MB | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 67000 Million | 40000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on M2 Max and M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 79 Watt | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU | Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
WebXPRT 3
CrossMark Overall
WebXPRT 4 Overall
Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 16.81 | 13.73 |
Apple M2 Max has a 22.4% higher aggregate performance score.
The M2 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the M2 Pro in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M2 Max and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
