EPYC 4564P vs Apple M1

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1
2020
8 cores / 8 threads
5.17
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.68
+668%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Apple M1 by a whopping 668% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking120766
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.25
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data22.09
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (2023−2024)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed2.064 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache2 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors16000 Million13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM5
Power consumption (TDP)no data170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M1 8-Core GPUAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 5.17
EPYC 4564P 39.68
+668%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 8207
EPYC 4564P 63036
+668%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.17 39.68
Integrated graphics card 14.49 1.98
Recency 10 November 2020 21 May 2024
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32

Apple M1 has 631.8% faster integrated GPU.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 667.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1
M1
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2249 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.