Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs Apple M1 Pro

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2064 Watt
11.24
+24.3%

Apple M1 Pro outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v4 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking710863
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.54
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple M-SeriesIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiencyno data6.11
Architecture codenameno dataBroadwell (2015−2019)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,057

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1016
Base clock speed2.064 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rateno data2 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cache2.9 MBno data
L2 cache28 MB2 MB
L3 cache24 MB25 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors33700 Million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)2064 ‑ 3220 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Pro 11.24
+24.3%
Xeon E5-2667 v4 9.04

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 Pro 17194
+24.4%
Xeon E5-2667 v4 13827

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.24 9.04
Recency 18 October 2021 20 June 2016
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 10 16
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2064 Watt 135 Watt

Apple M1 Pro has a 24.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 25% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2667 v4, on the other hand, has 60% more threads, and 1428.9% lower power consumption.

The Apple M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2667 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2667 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and Xeon E5-2667 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Xeon E5-2667 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 402 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1249 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2667 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 Pro or Xeon E5-2667 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.