FX-8370 vs Apple M1 Pro

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 Pro
2021
10 cores / 10 threads, 2064 Watt
10.86
+178%
FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.90

Apple M1 Pro outperforms FX-8370 by a whopping 178% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking7111444
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.83
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data2.94
Architecture codenameno dataVishera (2012−2015)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads108
Base clock speed2.064 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache2.9 MBno data
L2 cache28 MB8192 KB
L3 cache24 MBno data
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors33700 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)2064 ‑ 3220 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M1 Pro 16-Core GPUOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Pro 10.86
+178%
FX-8370 3.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 Pro 17192
+179%
FX-8370 6166

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.86 3.90
Recency 18 October 2021 2 September 2014
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 10 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2064 Watt 125 Watt

Apple M1 Pro has a 178.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

FX-8370, on the other hand, has 1551.2% lower power consumption.

The Apple M1 Pro is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 Pro is a notebook processor while FX-8370 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro and FX-8370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro
M1 Pro
AMD FX-8370
FX-8370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 404 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 375 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M1 Pro or FX-8370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.