Ryzen 5 7535U vs Apple M1 Pro 8-Core

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
2021
8 cores / 8 threads
10.83
+0.7%
Ryzen 5 7535U
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 28 Watt
10.75

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms Ryzen 5 7535U by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking722727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesApple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiencyno data36.33
Architecture codenameno dataRembrandt-R (2023)
Release date18 October 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.06 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.22 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache2.3 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors33700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFP7
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU ( - 1296 MHz)AMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 10.83
+0.7%
Ryzen 5 7535U 10.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 17204
+0.8%
Ryzen 5 7535U 17068

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 1320
Ryzen 5 7535U 1397
+5.8%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 210
Ryzen 5 7535U 217
+3.3%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 9942
+65.1%
Ryzen 5 7535U 6021

WebXPRT 3

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 343
+41.2%
Ryzen 5 7535U 243

CrossMark Overall

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 1490
+22.4%
Ryzen 5 7535U 1217

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.83 10.75
Recency 18 October 2021 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, 33.3% more physical cores, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 7535U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M1 Pro 8-Core and Ryzen 5 7535U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U
Ryzen 5 7535U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 104 votes

Rate M1 Pro 8-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 79 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M1 Pro 8-Core or Ryzen 5 7535U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.