Xeon Silver 4410T vs A9-9425

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.73
Xeon Silver 4410T
2023
10 cores / 20 threads, 150 Watt
18.17
+950%

Xeon Silver 4410T outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2043335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data72.05
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.9111.46
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$624

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB26.25 MB
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C84 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4000
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9425 1.73
Xeon Silver 4410T 18.17
+950%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9425 1513
Xeon Silver 4410T 28859
+1807%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 18.17
Recency 31 May 2016 10 January 2023
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

A9-9425 has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4410T, on the other hand, has a 950.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 400% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

The Xeon Silver 4410T is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9425 in performance tests.

Be aware that A9-9425 is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4410T is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Xeon Silver 4410T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
Intel Xeon Silver 4410T
Xeon Silver 4410T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1537 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 17 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4410T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Xeon Silver 4410T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.