Xeon Phi 7235 vs A9-9425

VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2043not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Xeon Phi
Power efficiency10.91no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Knights Mill (2017)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2256
Base clock speed3.1 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.4 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache128K (per core)32K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.550-1.2V

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4SVLCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2133
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data102.381 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data36

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 1 December 2017
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 256
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

A9-9425 has 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Phi 7235, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 3100% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A9-9425 is a notebook processor while Xeon Phi 7235 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Xeon Phi 7235, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
Intel Xeon Phi 7235
Xeon Phi 7235

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1537 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Phi 7235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Xeon Phi 7235, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.