EPYC 9175F vs A9-9420e

VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2705not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.42no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,256

Detailed specifications

A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data4.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size124.5 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketBGASP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 320 Watt

A9-9420e has 2033.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A9-9420e is a notebook processor while EPYC 9175F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420e and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 149 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420e or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.