Turion 64 ML-28 vs A9-9410

VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2491not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeTurion 64
Power efficiency6.06no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Lancaster (2005−2006)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)June 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size125 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4754
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9410 1522
+499%
Turion 64 ML-28 254

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A9-9410 2694
+124%
Turion 64 ML-28 1201

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A9-9410 2455
+334%
Turion 64 ML-28 566

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

A9-9410 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Turion 64 ML-28, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
AMD Turion 64 ML-28
Turion 64 ML-28

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 113 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 ML-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410 or Turion 64 ML-28, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.