Core 2 Quad Q8200s vs A9-9410

VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2491not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency6.07no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)18 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz0.33 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size125 mm22x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C76 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 18 January 2009
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A9-9410 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q8200s, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A9-9410 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q8200s is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and Core 2 Quad Q8200s, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9410
A9-9410
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200s
Core 2 Quad Q8200s

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 113 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 11 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q8200s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9410 or Core 2 Quad Q8200s, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.