E-350 vs A8 PRO-7600B

VS

Primary details

Comparing A8 PRO-7600B and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1978not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.71no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8 PRO-7600B and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm40 nm
Die size245 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,411 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A8 PRO-7600B and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FT1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8 PRO-7600B and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8 PRO-7600B and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8 PRO-7600B and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 6310
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8 PRO-7600B and E-350 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8 PRO-7600B and E-350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8 PRO-7600B and E-350.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8 PRO-7600B 2960
+603%
E-350 421

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8 PRO-7600B 415
+295%
E-350 105

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8 PRO-7600B 1014
+466%
E-350 179

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 July 2014 4 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

A8 PRO-7600B has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

E-350, on the other hand, has 261.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A8 PRO-7600B and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8 PRO-7600B is a desktop processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8 PRO-7600B and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8 PRO-7600B
A8 PRO-7600B
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 148 votes

Rate A8 PRO-7600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8 PRO-7600B or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.