Celeron E3400 vs A8-9600

Primary details

Comparing A8-9600 and Celeron E3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1880	2830
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.13	3.72
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	3.04	0.80
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date	27 July 2017 (7 years ago)	17 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$78	$76

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A8-9600 has 280% better value for money than Celeron E3400.

Detailed specifications

A8-9600 and Celeron E3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.4 GHz	2.6 GHz
L1 cache	no data	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	2048 KB	1 MB (shared)
L3 cache	0 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm
Die size	250 mm2	82 mm2
Maximum core temperature	90 °C	74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	3,100 million	228 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on A8-9600 and Celeron E3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM4	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-9600 and Celeron E3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-
FRTC	+	-
FreeSync	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
TrueAudio	+	-
PowerNow	+	-
PowerGating	+	-
VirusProtect	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+

Security technologies

A8-9600 and Celeron E3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-9600 and Celeron E3400 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	-
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-9600 and Celeron E3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2400	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Max memory channels	2	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	AMD Radeon R7 Graphics	no data
iGPU core count	6	no data
Enduro	+	-
UVD	+	-
VCE	+	-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-9600 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-9600 and Celeron E3400 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-9600 and Celeron E3400.

PCIe version	3.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	8	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.09	0.55
Recency	27 July 2017	17 January 2010
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	28 nm	45 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between A8-9600 and Celeron E3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---