Atom Z3740 vs A8-8600P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-8600P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.55
+297%
Atom Z3740
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.39

A8-8600P outperforms Atom Z3740 by a whopping 297% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-8600P and Atom Z3740 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21293021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency4.1918.44
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$32

Detailed specifications

A8-8600P and Atom Z3740 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.86 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-8600P and Atom Z3740 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-8600P and Atom Z3740. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

A8-8600P and Atom Z3740 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-8600P and Atom Z3740 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-8600P and Atom Z3740. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count6no data
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-8600P and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-8600P and Atom Z3740 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-8600P and Atom Z3740.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-8600P 1.55
+297%
Atom Z3740 0.39

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-8600P 2464
+297%
Atom Z3740 621

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 0.39
Recency 3 June 2015 27 September 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 2 Watt

A8-8600P has a 297.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Atom Z3740, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The A8-8600P is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3740 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-8600P and Atom Z3740, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-8600P
A8-8600P
Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate A8-8600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 41 vote

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-8600P or Atom Z3740, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.