Xeon E5440 vs A8-7680

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.23
+49.7%

A8-7680 outperforms Xeon E5440 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7680 and Xeon E5440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18272144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD A8no data
Power efficiency4.691.76
Architecture codenameExcavator (2017−2018)no data
Release date26 October 2018 (6 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$56no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7680 and Xeon E5440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.83 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cacheno data12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on A8-7680 and Xeon E5440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7680 and Xeon E5440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

A8-7680 and Xeon E5440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7680 and Xeon E5440 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7680 and Xeon E5440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R7 Seriesno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7680 2.23
+49.7%
Xeon E5440 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7680 3544
+49.3%
Xeon E5440 2374

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.23 1.49
Recency 26 October 2018 1 January 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 80 Watt

A8-7680 has a 49.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 77.8% lower power consumption.

The A8-7680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5440 in performance tests.

Note that A8-7680 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5440 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7680 and Xeon E5440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7680
A8-7680
Intel Xeon E5440
Xeon E5440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 511 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 485 votes

Rate Xeon E5440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7680 or Xeon E5440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.