i3-3245 vs A8-7680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.23
+49.7%
Core i3-3245
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.49

A8-7680 outperforms Core i3-3245 by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7680 and Core i3-3245 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18272145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.78no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A8no data
Power efficiency4.692.56
Architecture codenameExcavator (2017−2018)no data
Release date26 October 2018 (6 years ago)1 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$56no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7680 and Core i3-3245 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache128K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cacheno data3 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data65 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A8-7680 and Core i3-3245 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7680 and Core i3-3245. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
FDIno data+

Security technologies

A8-7680 and Core i3-3245 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data-
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7680 and Core i3-3245 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7680 and Core i3-3245. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R7 SeriesIntel HD Graphics 4000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7680 and Core i3-3245 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7680 and Core i3-3245.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7680 2.23
+49.7%
i3-3245 1.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7680 3544
+49.3%
i3-3245 2373

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.23 1.49
Recency 26 October 2018 1 April 2013
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt

A8-7680 has a 49.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and 22.2% lower power consumption.

i3-3245, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The A8-7680 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3245 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7680 and Core i3-3245, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7680
A8-7680
Intel Core i3-3245
Core i3-3245

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 511 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 30 votes

Rate Core i3-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7680 or Core i3-3245, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.