A10-9620P vs A8-7670K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7670K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.02
+26.3%
A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60

A8-7670K outperforms A10-9620P by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7670K and A10-9620P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19242106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataBristol Ridge
Power efficiency2.0110.09
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 July 2015 (9 years ago)1 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7670K and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A8-7670K and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+FP4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7670K and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7670K and A10-9620P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7670K and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3, DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7670K and A10-9620P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7670K and A10-9620P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7670K and A10-9620P.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7670K 2.02
+26.3%
A10-9620P 1.60

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7670K 3213
+26.6%
A10-9620P 2538

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 1.60
Recency 20 July 2015 1 January 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

A8-7670K has a 26.3% higher aggregate performance score.

A10-9620P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The A8-7670K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.

Note that A8-7670K is a desktop processor while A10-9620P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7670K and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7670K
A8-7670K
AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7670K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7670K or A10-9620P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.