EPYC Embedded 8434P vs A8-7650K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1932not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.96no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date7 January 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$152no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size245 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+SP6
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VTno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1696

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2015 1 October 2024
Physical cores 4 48
Threads 4 96
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 200 Watt

A8-7650K has 110.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A8-7650K is a desktop processor while EPYC Embedded 8434P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7650K and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7650K
A8-7650K
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 190 votes

Rate A8-7650K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7650K or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.